Page Comparison

This page houses documentation related to:

...

#

Outcome

1

"Manager Review Section" was not showing AT the "Manager Review" stage

This behavior was rectified; cause: "Send back to Employee" field was hidden... the rule that exposed this section required that "Send back to Employee" is set to "No" — however, in a hidden state, the value of the field (as far as the rule is concerned), is neither "No" nor "Yes" — so the fix was as simple as making that field visible

2

The "Date Completed" was getting prefilled AS SOON AS the form was opened by HR (in the "HR Review" Stage); this is problematic... because what if the user selects one of the "No - Send to ...." option instead of "Yes"?

This behavior was rectified, by logging the "Date Completed" only when the user selects "Yes" — each of the other options for "Is this form complete?", will blank-out / reset this field

3

HR Role cannot cancel, at the "HR Review" stage, as the form complains about the "Comments for..." boxes being empty... (which aren't shown unless it's corresponding selection is made in the "Is this form complete?" question....

This behavior was rectified by making all comment boxes "not required" by default, and toggling it's required state programmatically

Anchor

	dev-testing-09212020-4
	dev-testing-09212020-4

4

For the longest time, the calculation table fields (i.e. Effective Date, Annual Salary as of, etc.) had no labels... this posed two problems:

When adding these fields to rules, one needed to know the IDs of fields to be added, which becomes tedious as you are constantly switching back and forth between the Rules UI and going into the field's (that needs to be added to the rule) properties
to grab it's ID.
- So we are going to add the label and then use CSS to hide those labels.
The red asterisk "*" before the field didn't show, even though in the Leap UI, it's shown...This is because we used "empty" label (i.e. the input field was created and no label was provided).
- To fix this, we will (yet again) use CSS to add an asterisk in the beginning of the "text" field (i.e. as a prefix)

Before	After
Currently (prior to doing the above), here's how the retroactive calculation table looks. The boxes outlined should have a * indicator... as they are indeed required:	Here's how it looks now

5

If HR is cancelling the form at the "Under Review by HR Specialist" stage, hide the "Send back to HR" and "CLOSE OUT" buttons.... actually, confirm with Functional Lead: we need to get rid of the "Send back to HR" submit button right (since the purpose of that was so that the Salary/GWI/Merit info can be updated)?

~~Before~~	~~After~~
~~Image Modified~~	~~Image Modified~~

We need to keep the button because:
In the event that the wrong HR Specialist team member was assigned, the application can be sent back to the "Under HR Review" stage, where the HR Role team member can assign the correct HRS Team member

6

There is an inconsistency with submit buttons:

On some stages, we are hiding the "submit button" (e.g. "Submit for Manager Review") and only showing it once all criteria for being able to submit are met, whereas
On others we are showing the button, however it is disabled until all criteria for being able to submit are met, at which point the button is enabled

I recommend that all buttons be shown, but disabled, until all criteria for being able to submit are met! (the latter is more prevalent than the former... so it is also quicker to get done!)

7

All emails & ACMs include HR's logo from the phptst1 server... make sure to switch the image URL to the FEB central server.

NOTE: HR logo appears in all emails and ACMs etc. as it should right now... this just future-proofs it!

8

While the email preview shows how the body of the email will look like, it does not show the following—

To
Cc
Subject

Proposing the following—

Instead of	We do

NOTE: the above 'We do' is merely a mock-up!

...

Form #

Applies to Task#

Stage

Result

106

12 & 13

HR Form Received

108

12 & 13

Under Employee Input

126

12 & 13

Under Review by Supervisor

127

12 & 13

Under Review by Additional Reviewer for Supervisor

109

12 & 13

Under Review by Manager

128

12 & 13

Under Review by Additional Reviewer for Manager

110

12 & 13

Under Review by HR

129

12 & 13

Under Review by HR Specialist

130

14

Under Review by HR

Selection	Behavior	Behavior AFTER Providing Comments
NO SELECTION		N/A
No - Send to Employee
No - Send to Supervisor
No - Send to Additional Reviewer for Supervisor
No - Send to Manager
No - Send to Additional Reviewer for Manager
Yes		N/A